Friday, September 11, 2009

Listening to a Liar by Thomas Sowell

Listening to a Liar by Thomas Sowell

The most important thing about what anyone says are not the words themselves but the credibility of the person who says them.

The words of convicted swindler Bernie Madoff were apparently quite convincing to many people who were regarded as knowledgeable and sophisticated. If you go by words, you can be led into anything.

No doubt millions of people will be listening to the words of President Barack Obama Wednesday night when he makes a televised address to a joint session of Congress on his medical care plans. But, if they think that the words he says are what matters, they can be led into something much worse than being swindled out of their money.

One plain fact should outweigh all the words of Barack Obama and all the impressive trappings of the setting in which he says them: He tried to rush Congress into passing a massive government takeover of the nation's medical care before the August recess-- for a program that would not take effect until 2013!

Whatever President Obama is, he is not stupid. If the urgency to pass the medical care legislation was to deal with a problem immediately, then why postpone the date when the legislation goes into effect for years-- more specifically, until the year after the next Presidential election?

If this is such an urgently needed program, why wait for years to put it into effect? And if the public is going to benefit from this, why not let them experience those benefits before the next Presidential election?

If it is not urgent that the legislation goes into effect immediately, then why don't we have time to go through the normal process of holding Congressional hearings on the pros and cons, accompanied by public discussions of its innumerable provisions? What sense does it make to "hurry up and wait" on something that is literally a matter of life and death?

If we do not believe that the President is stupid, then what do we believe? The only reasonable alternative seems to be that he wanted to get this massive government takeover of medical care passed into law before the public understood what was in it.

Moreover, he wanted to get re-elected in 2012 before the public experienced what its actual consequences would be.

Unfortunately, this way of doing things is all too typical of the way this administration has acted on a wide range of issues.

Consider the "stimulus" legislation. Here the administration was successful in rushing a massive spending bill through Congress in just two days-- after which it sat on the President's desk for three days, while he was away on vacation. But, like the medical care legislation, the "stimulus" legislation takes effect slowly.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that it will be September 2010 before even three-quarters of the money will be spent. Some economists expect that it will not all be spent by the end of 2010.

What was the rush to pass it, then? It was not to get that money out into the economy as fast as possible. It was to get that money-- and the power that goes with it-- into the hands of the government. Power is what politics is all about.

The worst thing that could happen, from the standpoint of those seeking more government power over the economy, would be for the economy to begin recovering on its own while months were being spent debating the need for a "stimulus" bill. As the President's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, said, you can't let a crisis "go to waste" when "it's an opportunity to do things you could not do before."

There are lots of people in the Obama administration who want to do things that have not been done before-- and to do them before the public realizes what is happening.

The proliferation of White House "czars" in charge of everything from financial issues to media issues is more of the same circumvention of the public and of the Constitution. Czars don't have to be confirmed by the Senate, the way Cabinet members must be, even though czars may wield more power, so you may never know what these people are like, until it is too late.

What Barack Obama says Wednesday night is not nearly as important as what he has been doing-- and how he has been doing it.

About The Author
-------------------------------------------------------------...
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institute and author of The Housing Boom and Bust.

senior fellow stanford universitys hoover institute author housing boom bust

Thursday, September 10, 2009

Explosive undercover ACORN video



Dear Gentlemen Earlier this week I wrote you regarding the lack of reporting the public is seeing, or not seeing in the media and in the "newspapers"

Dear Gentlemen

Earlier this week I wrote you regarding the lack of reporting the public is seeing, or not seeing in the media and in the "newspapers", local and national. Again, I see headlines on Obama, naturally bias, and again, the real stories are being neglected. I still see you have not picked up on any of the Czar stories....no story on Van Jones or the implications of a threat his Czar appointment was to this Nation.

I have another story for ya! Of course, I don't imagine I will be seeing it in your news paper. I don't believe I will even see my letters to you posted in your paper either, but here it goes anyway.

ACORN is directly linked to the White House.....do the investing...it's not that hard to link them together. Here is the story on youtube that should be of interest to you.....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtTnizEnC1U&feature=player_embedded


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TNYU9PamIZk&feature=player_embedded

These are the links to two video's that two undercover reporters taped during their investigation on ACORN. It's explosive and it's news. We deserve to get this out to the public. This is news, real news! I'm tired of reading bias pieces on the President's Health Care proposals that are not even spelled out to the people. He didn't make clear on his plan, yet he did make it clear that the Republican's are the enemy.

Why don't you try being reporters? Ask questions...do some reporting...get these stories that are implications of scandal that have direct impact on us...the public!

Once again, a concerned citizen of Cotati, CA

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

Letter to Press Democrat

Two days after Van Jones stepped down from his position as one of PBO's Czars, I have only seen one article in the local paper here in Cotati, CA. I'm a little steamed that this is not news worthy to so called reporters! I know that the drive-by media are bias, but this is a bunch of bull.....this is the letter I wrote to the editors:

Dear Gentlemen,

I'm writing you because I'm baffled and quite concerned about the lack of interest the media and news entities, nation wide as well as local, have with issues that are not only news worthy, but may be crucial for the people of this nation to be informed on. I'm speaking in particular about the recent resignation of Van Jones, one of the Obama Administration Czar's.

During uncertain times in our Nation, I believe we, the public, deserve as much information as we can possibly get from reporters. Instead, many of us are left in the dark, ignorant to what is happening in our Government, which will end up having a direct effect on each of us in one way or another. I believe we are in a National crisis and there are people in places that are playing with our future. I believe that it is the reporters job to ask the real questions, regardless of political views or if it means they will have to face some unkind truths they just don't want to believe. Reporters report news, not only the news they choose to report on.

I have been aware of the questionable views of Van Jones for a few weeks now. This story has been surfacing and reported on by one information source, and it was out there for all to question and do their own ingestion, but no one is asking the question. Ohhhh but it doesn't stop there, because after the story was broken it never hit the papers nor did it find it's way to the top story in the network news stations. Mr. Van Jones stepped down from his position in the White House as a "Czar" and it became nothing more than a blip in news papers and the news. I believe your paper mentioned it on the 6th and left it at that.

For months already, I have witnessed bias reporting and in this case, lack of reporting. The media is failing us. Why are you not asking the questions? If he slipped in the cracks and by chance ended up in the White House, should we be looking at other Czars? How did this happen? Was the President in danger? If he knew about Mr. Jones' political view's, are we in danger? Please, there is something going on here! Why is it that reporters are not reporting? Why are editors not demanding the real stories? Villifying people who do not agree with personal political views does not a story make! Getting to the truth during a dire time in this Nation's history is the story! Facts and truth are what is needed during these days of uncertainty.

I am asking you to, please, start asking questions and searching for truth. We need a form of information we can go to and know that no matter what, we will be getting the stories of interest, of necessity and are factual and accurate.

Sincerely and Extremely Concerned